Updated August 2026
Epithalon (Epitalon) Dosage: Research Protocol, Reconstitution, and Evidence
Research note: Epithalon—more commonly Epitalon in current scientific and FDA materials—is the defined synthetic tetrapeptide Ala-Glu-Asp-Gly (AEDG). It is not the same substance as Epithalamin, a heterogeneous bovine-pineal extract. No human dose-finding study has established a standard systemic Epitalon dose. This page separates studied exposures, translational hypotheses, and community protocols.
Established systemic dose: none. Best-described human systemic exposure: 0.5 mg/day sublingually for 20 days (three sprays twice daily) in a small randomized placebo-controlled circadian-biomarker study. Human SC trial dose: none located.
2026 translational hypothesis: 100–300 µg per treatment day — indirect animal/comparative-potency estimate, not a validated clinical range. Common community cycle: 5–10 mg SC or IM daily for 10–20 days appears inherited from Epithalamin extract milligram schedules rather than synthetic-AEDG dose-finding.
Evidence-anchored replication: 0.25 mg SL twice daily × 20 days (0.5 mg/day; 10 mg/course). Exploratory SC concept: 0.2 mg once daily × 10 days (2 mg total) as a monitored microgram-range pilot — not a treatment schedule.
Epithalon dosage in 30 seconds
| Question | Research summary |
|---|---|
| Preferred scientific name | Epitalon (Epithalon = common alternate) |
| Sequence | Ala-Glu-Asp-Gly (AEDG) · 4 aa · ≈390.35 g/mol free base |
| ≠ Epithalamin | Defined peptide vs bovine-pineal extract |
| Best human systemic exposure | 0.5 mg/day SL × 20 days |
| Human SC trial dose | None located |
| 2026 hypothesis | 100–300 µg/treatment day (not validated) |
| Common community cycle | 5–10 mg SC/IM × 10–20 days (likely extract-derived) |
| Proven longevity / in-vivo telomere effect | None established |
| Tested sport | Not named; WADA S0 likely applicable |
What is Epithalon?
Epithalon and Epitalon usually refer to the same four-amino-acid peptide, H-Ala-Glu-Asp-Gly-OH. FDA uses “Epitalon” and recognizes “Epithalon” as an alternate name. Because neither is a formal USAN, research records should include sequence, molecular form, counterion, and assay basis.
Free base (C14H22N4O9, ≈390.35 g/mol, CAS 307297-39-8) and acetate (represented 1:1 ≈450.40 g/mol, CAS 307297-40-1) are not interchangeable without assay conversion. A vial labeled only “Epithalon 10 mg” does not disclose what 10 mg means.
Identity gate
Confirm synthetic AEDG — not Epithalamin extract or unresolved salt mass
Matches the Epitalon / Epithalon identity on this page
Defined tetrapeptide. FDA uses “Epitalon”; Epithalon is a common alternate spelling. Always record sequence, free base vs acetate, and active-peptide assay — not the trade name alone.
Free base vs acetate
| Property | Free base | Acetate (represented 1:1) |
|---|---|---|
| Formula | C14H22N4O9 | C14H22N4O9·C2H4O2 (FDA representation) |
| MW | ≈390.35 g/mol | ≈450.40 g/mol |
| CAS | 307297-39-8 | 307297-40-1 |
| Same gross mass as active free base? | N/A | No — counterion/water change mass |
Epitalon and Epithalamin are not interchangeable
Epithalamin is an animal-tissue extract containing a mixture of pineal peptides. Epitalon is one synthetic tetrapeptide developed from study of that extract. Similar names do not make milligram doses equivalent.
The frequently cited 2003 study that followed 266 older adults evaluated Thymalin and Epithalamin, alone or together — not synthetic AEDG. Its mortality findings cannot establish an Epitalon dose or longevity effect.
Identity comparison
| Question | Epitalon / Epithalon | Epithalamin |
|---|---|---|
| Material | Defined synthetic AEDG | Heterogeneous bovine-pineal extract |
| One sequence / MW? | Yes | No |
| Molar dose calculable? | Yes, if assay/form known | No single molar dose |
| Common historical mass | µg-scale in animals; 0.5 mg/day in one human SL study | Often 5–10 mg per treatment day |
| Transfer findings directly? | No | No |
What has actually been studied in humans?
FDA’s 2026 literature review identified three publications administering synthetic Epitalon/AEDG to humans: two sublingual circadian-biomarker publications (likely related/overlapping) and one parabulbar retinitis-pigmentosa report.
There is no FDA-approved dosage. The exposures below are research exposures — not a prescribing protocol.
Human evidence status
Narrow systemic human dosing — no SC trial dose located
- Established systemic dose
- None
- Best-described human systemic exposure
- 0.5 mg/day SL × 20 days (small RCT biomarker study)
- Human SC trial dose
- None located (FDA 2026 review)
- Human local ophthalmic exposure
- 5 µg/eye parabulbar daily × 10 days
- 2026 translational hypothesis
- 100–300 µg per treatment day — not clinically validated
- Common community cycle
- 5–10 mg SC/IM daily × 10–20 days (likely Epithalamin-derived)
- Proven human longevity effect
- None
- Proven human in-vivo telomere lengthening
- None established
- Formal human pharmacokinetics
- Not established
- U.S. prescribing label
- None
Human research dosage table
| Study | Dose | Route | Duration | Main limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivko et al., 2021 circadian | 0.5 mg/day (3 sprays BID) | Sublingual spray | 20 days | Small; no sleep outcome; safety not reported; spray volume not reported |
| Related 2021 clock-gene paper | Appears linked to same 0.5 mg/day SL | Sublingual | 20 days | Likely overlapping cohort — not independent replication |
| Khavinson et al., 2002 RP report | 5 µg per eye daily | Parabulbar / periocular | 10 days | Specialist local route; limited modern methods reporting |
A biomarker increase in urinary 6-SMT is not proof of insomnia treatment. Parabulbar injection is an ophthalmic procedure — never a self-administered systemic route.
Epitalon research dosage range
Direct human evidence supports only two very different exposures: 0.5 mg/day SL × 20 days and 5 µg/eye × 10 days. It does not support a general 5–10 mg subcutaneous cycle.
Evidence split
Studied AEDG vs 2026 microgram hypothesis vs community milligram cycles
Clinically studied synthetic AEDG
Narrow human evidence
- Dose
- 0.5 mg/day SL; 5 µg/eye locally
- Frequency
- SL divided BID; eye once daily
- Route
- Sublingual or parabulbar
- Duration
- 20 days SL; 10 days ocular
- Controlled outcome
- 6-SMT / clock genes; retinal measures
- Formal SC safety
- Not established
2026 microgram hypothesis
Translational — not a human result
- Dose
- 100–300 µg per treatment day
- Basis
- Animal allometry + Epithalamin potency contrast
- Route / schedule
- Not validated
- 70 kg HED band
- ≈189–231 µg/day (math only)
- SC pilot concept
- 0.2 mg SC daily × 10 days (2 mg cumulative)
- Status
- Hypothesis-generating review
Community injection reports
Anecdotal · likely extract-dose carryover
- Dose
- Commonly 5–10 mg/day (broader 1–20+ mg)
- Frequency
- Usually once daily; sometimes intermittent
- Route
- Primarily SC; sometimes IM
- Duration
- Usually 10–20 days
- Repeat
- Often every 4–6 months — unvalidated
- Controlled outcome
- None
Commonly reported research protocols
| Protocol | Dose | Route | Duration | Evidence basis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human circadian-biomarker | 0.5 mg/day (0.25 mg BID) | Sublingual | 20 days | Human clinical evidence (small RCT) |
| Human retinal | 5 µg/eye daily | Parabulbar | 10 days | Older controlled clinical report; local only |
| Microgram translational hypothesis | 100–300 µg/treatment day | Route not validated | Undefined | 2026 hypothesis-generating review |
| Lower community cycle | 1–2 mg/day | Usually SC | 20–30 days | Anecdotal |
| Legacy community cycle | 5–10 mg/day | SC or IM | 10–20 days | Widely repeated; likely Epithalamin-derived |
| Intermittent community | 10 mg days 1, 5, 9, 13, 17 | Usually SC | 17 days | Anecdotal; no controlled source located |
The common 5–10 mg amount is 10–20× the 0.5 mg/day human SL exposure and roughly 17–100× the 100–300 µg translational range. These are administered-mass comparisons — not exposure equivalence (bioavailability unknown).
The 2026 microgram-dose hypothesis
A 2026 mini-review proposed that future human dose-finding begin around 100–300 µg per treatment day, highlighting the Epithalamin-to-Epitalon dosing error. Inputs included ≈500-fold potency contrast in one primate melatonin model, long-term mouse work at 1 µg/mouse, and a surface-area HED of roughly 2.7–3.3 µg/kg.
This remains a single-author hypothesis, not a human trial. Route, frequency, and course length are undefined. Body-surface-area scaling is weak without PK. The table below is mathematical only — not individualized dosing.
HED math only
2.7–3.3 µg/kg mouse-to-human estimate — not a validated human dose
Low (2.7 µg/kg)
189 µg
High (3.3 µg/kg)
231 µg
Mathematical allometry only — ignores human PK, route bioavailability, and telomere-biology species differences. Do not personalize dosing from this table.
Protocol A: 20-day sublingual replication study
The most defensible fixed protocol replicates the published human sublingual exposure — preserving route and daily mass rather than converting it into an injection schedule.
Active: 0.25 mg SL twice daily × 20 days (0.5 mg/day; 10 mg cumulative). Placebo-controlled, no escalation, no catch-up, 28-day follow-up, no automatic repeat cycle.
Protocol A
0.5 mg/day SL × 20 days — evidence-anchored replication
1–20
0.5 mg
Morning
0.25 mg SL (3 sprays)
Evening
0.25 mg SL (3 sprays)
Replication of published human systemic exposure — ≈83.3 µg/spray; no escalation
Cumulative active exposure: 10 mg over 20 days. Do not double missed doses or add days after day 20.
Primary PD endpoint: overnight urinary 6-SMT change. Key clinical sleep endpoint should be actigraphy-derived TST/efficiency or a validated insomnia measure — do not declare “circadian restoration” from one urine sample.
Protocol B: exploratory 0.2 mg SC sentinel cohort
No human SC dose has been established. A formal dose-finding pilot concept uses 0.2 mg (200 µg) SC once daily × 10 days (cumulative 2.0 mg) with placebo control, PK sampling, and independent safety review — approximating the 70 kg HED band from the 2026 review.
Prefer a purpose-made 0.2 mg single-dose presentation. Do not improvise from an unidentified high-mass vial. This does not replace Protocol A and is not a treatment schedule. No evidence-based SC escalation ladder exists.
Reconstitution and concentration math
Reconstitution math shows volume — not solubility, sterility, stability, or suitability for injection. FDA’s 2026 review found limited aqueous-solubility data and noted free-base injection may be difficult to prepare at ~3 mg/mL in water.
For Protocol B, cleanest math uses a 0.2 mg single-dose vial (e.g., 0.20 mL at 1.0 mg/mL = 20 U-100 volume units). A 10 mg community vial is poorly suited to a 0.2 mg research question.
Reconstitution math
Volume arithmetic for microgram/low-mg targets — solubility separate
Vial (active mg)
Final volume
1.00 mg/mL · 10.0 µg per U-100 unit
0.200 mL · 20.0 units
Target 200 µg. Units are volume markings only — not a validated SC dose.
Cumulative-exposure comparison
| Schedule | Per-day | Duration | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|---|
| Human SL study | 0.5 mg | 20 days | 10 mg |
| Proposed SC microgram pilot | 0.2 mg | 10 days | 2 mg |
| Legacy lower cycle | 5 mg | 10 days | 50 mg |
| Legacy common cycle | 5 mg | 20 days | 100 mg |
| Legacy higher cycle | 10 mg | 10 days | 100 mg |
| Legacy high cumulative | 10 mg | 20 days | 200 mg |
The highest common legacy cycle cumulative mass is 100× the proposed 2 mg SC pilot. No human study establishes that larger cumulative exposure is more effective or acceptably safe. U-100 “units” are volume markings only.
Cumulative exposure
Legacy milligram cycles dwarf studied and hypothesized exposures
| Schedule | Per day | Duration | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|---|
| Human SL study | 0.5 mg | 20 days | 10 mg |
| Proposed SC microgram pilot | 0.2 mg | 10 days | 2 mg |
| Legacy lower cycle | 5 mg | 10 days | 50 mg |
| Legacy common cycle | 5 mg | 20 days | 100 mg |
| Legacy higher cycle | 10 mg | 10 days | 100 mg |
| Legacy high cumulative | 10 mg | 20 days | 200 mg |
Preclinical research dosages
Long-term SHR mice received 1 µg/mouse SC on 5 consecutive days each month. Epitalon did not significantly change mean lifespan; maximum lifespan reportedly increased ~12%, with model-specific tumor findings. Rhesus work used ~10 µg/animal/day IM × 10 days for melatonin/cortisol rhythms.
Animal and cell exposures are not human dosage instructions. Cultured-cell telomere/telomerase findings (including 2025 ALT activity in some cancer lines) do not prove human longevity benefit or cancer safety.
Mechanisms under investigation
Telomerase / telomeres: cell-culture work reports hTERT/telomerase upregulation and telomere lengthening; 2025 work also found ALT-associated extension in some breast-cancer lines — a reason for uncertainty, not a cancer-treatment claim.
Circadian / pineal: old macaques showed melatonin/cortisol rhythm effects; human SL study increased urinary 6-SMT. Isolated rat pineal superfusion did not show direct acute melatonin release at 1–100 µM.
Gene-expression / epigenetic hypotheses and antioxidant/retinal/immune findings remain mechanistic and often network-concentrated.
Expected results and timeline
What research can measure vs what cannot be concluded
| Time window | Measurable | Cannot conclude |
|---|---|---|
| First dose to day 3 | Acute tolerability; exploratory PK | Longevity, telomere extension, sleep treatment |
| Days 7–10 | Early 6-SMT, cortisol, actigraphy, AEs | Durable circadian “reset” |
| Day 20 | SL biomarker replication; prospectively measured sleep | Disease prevention or biological-age reversal |
| Weeks 4–7 after | Persistence/reversal; delayed AEs | Multi-year benefit or safety |
Subjective vivid dreams, energy, or “recovery” need blinded comparison — expectancy and concurrent supplements confound pre/post reports.
Safety and adverse effects
Human safety reporting is inadequate. FDA found no clinical study designed to assess Epitalon safety, particularly by the SC route. No formal MTD, human SC PK/immunogenicity, established AE incidence, or validated repeat-cycle safety.
Telomerase activation is not automatically beneficial. Conservative research excludes active/recent cancer and unexplained masses unless oncology-directed.
Safety monitoring
Incidence unknown — track local, hypersensitivity, sleep/mood, and product-quality risks
- Known incidence
- Inadequate — SL study did not report safety; no formal SC safety study
- Sublingual spray
- Monitor oral irritation, taste change, ulceration, mucosal swelling
- SC injection (community / pilot)
- Local pain, erythema, swelling, nodule, infection risk — incidence unknown
- Telomere / cancer uncertainty
- Telomerase/ALT biology is a theoretical concern; long-term carcinogenicity data absent
- Product risks
- Extract mislabeling, salt/assay errors, aggregation, sterility, unsupported concentration
Route of administration
Route evidence
| Route | Evidence | Main caveat |
|---|---|---|
| Sublingual | Clearest systemic human dose (0.5 mg/day) | Bioavailability / swallowed fraction not reported |
| Parabulbar | Older retinal report (5 µg/eye) | Specialist periocular — not self-directed systemic use |
| Subcutaneous | Dominates community use; FDA nomination route | No human SC efficacy/safety study located |
| Intramuscular | Rhesus macaque work; Epithalamin historical IM | Does not establish general human Epitalon IM protocol |
| Oral / intranasal | Experimental reports outside controlled human PK | No route-equivalence conversion factor |
Storage and stability
FDA cited lyophilized free-base stability ~3 weeks at room temperature, with longer-term storage desiccated below −18°C, and reconstituted free-base roughly 2–7 days at 4°C — not a universal finished-product label. Do not infer a 28-day refrigerated period from bacteriostatic water alone.
Use lot-specific stability data, prefer single-dose presentations, and discard after unsupported excursions, appearance changes, or missing identity/volume/date records.
Combining Epitalon with other peptides
No controlled study has established safety, dose, or synergy with GH secretagogues, thymic peptides, BPC-157, TB-500, GHK-Cu, NAD-related interventions, exosomes, or plasma exchange. Factorial arms are required — not a pre/post “stack” comparison.
U.S. status as of August 2026
There is no U.S. prescribing label. FDA evaluated Epitalon free base and acetate for compounded insomnia use at the July 2026 PCAC meeting. Staff recommended against 503A Bulks List inclusion; the advisory committee then voted narrowly in favor of recommending inclusion.
The committee vote is nonbinding and is not drug approval or an efficacy finding. Final list change requires FDA action.
Common claims vs evidence
Claim checker
Common Epithalon claims vs the evidence record
There is a standard Epithalon dosage
False
No standard systemic dose exists. The best-described human systemic exposure is 0.5 mg/day sublingually for 20 days.
Dosage evidence ladder
Dosage evidence ladder
Overall Epitalon dosing evidence: poorly established
| Level | What exists | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| FDA-approved dosing | None | — |
| Human systemic research dosing | One small 0.5 mg/day SL biomarker study (+ related publication) | Low |
| Human local research dosing | Older 5 µg/eye parabulbar report | Low · route-specific |
| Human SC dosing | None located | — |
| Published translational dosing | 100–300 µg per treatment day | Hypothesis-generating |
| Preclinical dosing | Multiple animal/cell models (often one research network) | Mechanistic / model-limited |
| Anecdotal research protocols | Commonly 5–10 mg/day SC or IM × 10–20 days | Unvalidated for synthetic AEDG |
| Repeat-cycle / long-term human dosing | Insufficient / none adequate | — |
Epitalon dosing is poorly established. A small human study provides a reproducible 0.5 mg/day SL research exposure, but no study defines a systemic injection dose, dose-response curve, MTD, or repeat interval.
WADA and tested sport
Epitalon/Epithalon was not found by name on the 2026 WADA Prohibited List. WADA S0 prohibits pharmacological substances lacking current governmental therapeutic approval. Tested athletes should treat Epitalon as likely prohibited under S0 unless their authority provides a current written determination.
Bottom line
Epithalon/Epitalon is a defined AEDG tetrapeptide with intriguing cell and animal research, but human dosing evidence is narrow. The clearest systemic human exposure is 0.5 mg/day SL × 20 days; the other traceable human dose is local 5 µg/eye. Neither validates community subcutaneous use.
The familiar 5–10 mg injection cycle appears to inherit Epithalamin extract dosing. A 2026 review proposed formal dose-finding around 100–300 µg/treatment day, but that remains indirect. A defensible program first replicates the SL study and, if evaluating SC, uses a monitored microgram-range sentinel cohort with PK, placebo, qualified single-dose material, and no automatic repeat cycle.
Confirm AEDG identity (≠ Epithalamin), free base vs acetate assay, and do not treat legacy milligram injection cycles as synthetic-Epitalon evidence.
Frequently asked questions
Is it called Epithalon or Epitalon?
Both spellings usually refer to AEDG. Epitalon is the spelling used in FDA’s 2026 review; Epithalon is a common alternate transliteration.
Is Epitalon the same as Epithalamin?
No. Epitalon is one defined synthetic tetrapeptide. Epithalamin is a heterogeneous bovine-pineal extract.
What is the standard Epithalon dosage?
No standard systemic dose exists. The best-described human systemic exposure is 0.5 mg/day sublingually for 20 days.
Did the SL study prove better sleep?
No. It measured urinary melatonin metabolite and clock-gene expression, not validated insomnia outcomes or sleep architecture.
Has subcutaneous Epitalon been tested in humans?
FDA’s 2026 literature review found no human clinical study using the proposed SC route.
What is the 100–300 microgram range?
A 2026 translational hypothesis based on animal allometry and Epithalamin comparisons. It has not been validated in human dose-finding.
Where did the 5–10 mg protocol come from?
The best-supported explanation is that milligram Epithalamin extract courses were carried over to purified synthetic Epitalon without a dose bridge.
Does Epitalon lengthen human telomeres in vivo?
It has lengthened telomeres in cultured human cells. That does not prove telomere lengthening in living people.
Did Epitalon extend mouse lifespan?
The 2003 SHR-mouse study did not increase mean lifespan. It increased maximum lifespan and lifespan of the longest-lived 10% in that model.
Can a 10 mg vial be reconstituted with 1 mL?
Arithmetic gives 10 mg/mL, but FDA reported limited free-base solubility and difficulty even around 3 mg/mL in water. Mathematical concentration is not formulation support.
How much is 0.2 mg from a 2 mg/2 mL preparation?
Concentration is 1 mg/mL. A 0.2 mg amount is 0.2 mL, or 20 U-100 volume units.
Should the cycle repeat every four months?
Not automatically. That interval is a community convention, not a validated synthetic-Epitalon schedule.
Is Epitalon allowed in tested sport?
It is not named individually in the 2026 list, but WADA S0 is likely applicable because it lacks current governmental therapeutic approval.
Should a missed dose be doubled?
No. Record it as missed rather than changing exposure.
References
FDA
Epitalon-Related Bulk Drug Substances: July 2026 PCAC evaluationFDA briefing document.
Ivko OM et al.
AEDG peptide regulation of human circadian rhythm genesAdv Gerontol 2021 — 0.5 mg/day SL × 20 days biomarker study.
Khavinson V et al.
Epitalon improves eye retina condition in retinitis pigmentosaNeuro Endocrinol Lett 2002 — 5 µg/eye parabulbar context.
Jung CH
The microgram hypothesis: translational dosing error in Epitalon researchAging Pathobiol Ther 2026 — 100–300 µg/day hypothesis.
Anisimov VN et al.
Epitalon on biomarkers of aging and lifespan in SHR miceBiogerontology 2003 — 1 µg/mouse monthly courses.
Al-Dulaimi S et al.
Epitalon increases telomere length in human cell linesBiogerontology 2025 — telomerase and ALT findings.
Khavinson VKh, Morozov VG
Peptides of pineal gland and thymus prolong human life2003 — Epithalamin ± Thymalin, not synthetic Epitalon.
WADA
2026 Prohibited ListNot named individually; S0 likely relevant.