KEDA Tetrapeptide · Patent-Reported Human Range

Livagen

Dosage & Dose Escalation Guide

Evidence-based Livagen dosage guide covering the KEDA tetrapeptide, patent-reported human dosing, a complete dose-verification protocol, community use, reconstitution math, safety, and liver research.

★★★★★4.3(280 reviews)Patent Human Example · No Modern RCT Dose
  • KEDA · Lys-Glu-Asp-Ala
  • 0.01–100 µg/kg IM
  • ≠ KED / Ventvil
  • No Human PK
Compare Providers
  • Identity

    Defined tetrapeptide KEDA (Lys-Glu-Asp-Ala). ≠ KED, KEDP, or Ventvil extract.

  • Patent human range

    0.01–100 µg/kg IM once daily × 10–40 days — individual doses not disclosed.

  • Next study

    Sequential dose verification across logarithmic IM cohorts — not a copied community cycle.

How It Works

Research themes include hepatocyte protein synthesis, liver-explant responses, ex-vivo lymphocyte chromatin changes, and enkephalinase inhibition in vitro. Human absorption, bioavailability, half-life, liver exposure, and dose-response remain unestablished. Laboratory signals do not validate liver regeneration or anti-aging claims.

Patent human record

  • 0.01–100 µg/kg IM once daily × 10–40 days
  • 23 active + 12 conventional-care comparator
  • No participant-level dose or modern AE table

Identity traps

  • KEDA ≠ KED tripeptide
  • KEDA ≠ KEDP (some online mislabels)
  • KEDA ≠ Ventvil calf-liver complex

Evidence limits

  • No modern peer-reviewed RCT dose
  • No human PK
  • Community mg schedules unvalidated

Result

Patent Human Admin: Very Low

Modern RCT: None

Community Schedules: Anecdotal

Expected Results Over Time

Updated August 2026

Livagen Dosage: Human Patent Research, Protocol, and Reconstitution

Research note: Livagen is the defined synthetic tetrapeptide Lys-Glu-Asp-Ala (KEDA). Its only located administered-human dose report is an older patent example, not a modern peer-reviewed clinical trial. The complete protocol below is a prospective research design for qualified investigators — not a personal treatment plan.

Clearest human record: 0.01–100 µg/kg IM once daily for 10–40 days in a US patent describing 23 adults with “chronic persistent hepatitis” vs 12 conventional-care comparators. The patent does not reveal each participant’s dose, dose-group sizes, randomization/blinding detail, or a formal adverse-event analysis.

For a 70 kg participant, that range equals 0.7 µg to 7 mg/day. Modern online schedules (200 µg SC × 10 days; 0.5–2 mg SC titration; 5–10 mg IM × 10 days) are mutually inconsistent and are not clinical-trial doses — one reviewed page even mislabels Livagen as KEDP.

Most defensible next study: sequential, placebo-controlled dose verification across fixed cohorts at 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 µg/kg IM for 10 days with sentinel dosing and safety gates — a proposed design inside the patent range, not the patent’s actual assignments.

Livagen dosage in 30 seconds

QuestionResearch summary
IdentityKEDA · Lys-Glu-Asp-Ala · ≈461.48 g/mol free peptide
KED · KEDP · Ventvil / liver extracts
Patent human amount0.01–100 µg/kg once daily IM × 10–40 days
Participant-level doseNot disclosed
70 kg daily span0.7 µg – 7 mg/day
Modern online range0.2–10 mg/day (incompatible SC/IM schedules)
Human PKNot established
Peer-reviewed liver benefitNot established

What is Livagen?

Livagen is a chemically defined four-amino-acid peptide (H-Lys-Glu-Asp-Ala-OH, KEDA) from the short peptide-bioregulator research program associated with Khavinson and colleagues. Primary patent US7101854B2 describes synthesis, parenteral formulation, animal work, and one human clinical example.

Free-peptide formula C18H31N5O9, MW 461.48. Patent example finished product was associated with acetate; salt, moisture, and assay basis change gross mass vs free-peptide-equivalent mass.

Identity gate

Confirm KEDA — not KED, KEDP, Ventvil, or unlabeled combination products

Matches Livagen identity on this page

Defined tetrapeptide H-Lys-Glu-Asp-Ala-OH (~461.48 g/mol free peptide). Confirm sequence by MS/MS, free-peptide-equivalent assay, salt/water basis, sterility, and endotoxin before trusting any unit chart.

Common identity errors

Name or labelWhat it isEquivalent to pure KEDA?
Livagen / KEDADefined Lys-Glu-Asp-AlaYes, if verified analytically
KEDLys-Glu-Asp tripeptideNo
KEDPLys-Glu-Asp-Pro tetrapeptideNo
VentvilCalf-liver polypeptide complexNo
Oral “Livagen” combinationMay mix KEDA + other ingredientsNo — separate exposures

Has Livagen been tested in humans?

[US7101854B2 Example 7](https://patents.google.com/patent/US7101854B2/en) is the only located source that clearly describes Livagen administration to living humans: 23 patients aged 32–53 with historical “chronic persistent hepatitis,” 0.01–100 µg/kg IM once daily for 10–40 days, vs 12 conventionally treated comparators.

The historical diagnosis requires caution — a modern replication needs cause-specific staging. Patent pre/post tables report symptom and lab changes in the active cohort (e.g., bilirubin, ALT, IgM marked significant in the source) but do not clearly report comparator outcomes or between-group analysis.

Human evidence status

Patent-reported IM cohort — not a modern peer-reviewed dose-finding trial

Standardized US prescribing dose
None
Clearest administered-human source
US7101854B2 Example 7 (patent)
Patent amount
0.01–100 µg/kg once daily
Patent route / duration
IM · 10–40 days
Participant-level dose disclosed?
No
Modern peer-reviewed RCT
None located
Human pharmacokinetics
Not established
Demonstrated peer-reviewed liver benefit
Not established
Modern online range reviewed
0.2–10 mg/day across incompatible SC/IM schedules

What the patent evidence does and does not show

SupportsDoes not establish
KEDA reportedly administered IM to humansA replicated peer-reviewed clinical benefit
10–40-day daily schedule usedWhich duration any individual received
Administered range 0.01–100 µg/kgWhich dose any participant received
Comparator group mentionedRandomization, blinding, or matched concurrent care

Human-cell / ex-vivo chromatin and enkephalinase studies are not dosing studies — they do not establish absorption, systemic dose, or clinical effect.

Livagen research dosage landscape

Patent and community amounts diverge because sellers start from 20 mg vial arithmetic, often substitute SC for patent IM without bridging data, and copy protocol language across sites. Nominal vial fill, salt mass, and free-peptide mass are frequently conflated.

Evidence split

Patent example vs proposed dose verification vs modern online schedules

Patent-reported human example

Patent-controlled · not a modern RCT

Amount
0.01–100 µg/kg (individual dose unknown)
Route
Intramuscular
Frequency
Once daily
Duration
10–40 days (by severity; individual unknown)
N
23 active + 12 conventional-care comparator
Key gap
No dose strata, blinding detail, or AE table

Proposed dose-verification design

Prospective Phase 1b-style framework

Cohorts
0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 100 µg/kg
Route
IM (patent-anchored)
Duration
10 consecutive days
Escalation
Between cohorts only + safety gates
Controls
Placebo + sentinel dosing
Claim
Safety/PK/exploratory markers — not efficacy

Modern online schedules

Anecdotal · mutually inconsistent

Low page
200 µg SC daily × 10 days (some mislabel KEDP)
Titration page
0.5 → 2 mg SC over 8–12 weeks (~126 mg)
High page
5–10 mg IM daily × 10 days
Route issue
Often SC without IM bridging study
Identity issue
Nominal vial mass ≠ assay-corrected KEDA
Primary source
None located for these schedules

Reported dosage landscape

SourceAmountRouteDurationClassification
Patent human example0.01–100 µg/kg dailyIM10–40 daysPatent-reported human administration
Low online protocol200 µg dailySC10 daysAnecdotal (some mislabel KEDP)
Gradual online titration0.5 → 2 mg dailySC8–12 weeksVendor/educational; no dose-finding source
High online convention5–10 mg dailyIM10 daysVendor/educational; no controlled support

Patent range by body weight (arithmetic only)

The following converts µg/kg tiers to daily mass. It is not personalization. The range spans four orders of magnitude — “use the middle” is not a scientifically valid dose-selection method.

Patent range math

µg/kg → daily mass — arithmetic only, not a dosing recommendation

Body weight

Patent / verification tier

Daily

70 µg

10-day total

700 µg

40-day total

2.80 mg

Patent range spans 10,000-fold. Participant-level doses were not disclosed. Do not “pick the middle.”

Complete patent-anchored dose-verification protocol

Prospective Phase 1b-style framework for pure KEDA in adults with stable, compensated, cause-specific chronic liver disease. Preserves patent route, frequency, range, and minimum duration while adding PK, sentinel dosing, and stop rules the patent omitted.

Cohorts: 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 100 µg/kg IM once daily × 10 days. Escalation between cohorts only. Primary endpoints are safety/tolerability — not powered efficacy. IRB/ethics, hepatology, pharmacy, and independent safety review required before use.

Dose-verification framework

10-day IM cohorts · sentinel dosing · between-cohort escalation only

1–10

Assigned tier µg/kg IM once daily

No within-participant escalation; sentinel dosing; PK on days 1 and 10

Primary analysis is descriptive safety — not proof of liver repair. Missed doses are skipped (not doubled). No automatic repeat cycle.

Fixed-volume scheme example (0.01 mL/kg admin volume)

CohortDoseConcentration70 kg amount
10.01 µg/kg1 µg/mL0.7 µg
20.1 µg/kg10 µg/mL7 µg
31 µg/kg100 µg/mL70 µg
410 µg/kg1 mg/mL700 µg
5100 µg/kg10 mg/mL7 mg

The patent’s example 10 µg/mL solution fits Cohort 2 under this scheme but cannot deliver the top tier at a practical volume (700 mL for 7 mg). Higher concentrations need new validation. Do not double missed doses, escalate within a course, or start automatic repeat cycles.

Documented community titration (not a recommendation)

One circulating 12-week 20 mg-vial schedule escalates 0.5 → 1 → 1.5 → 2 mg SC daily, totaling ~126 mg nominal peptide over 84 days (≈6.3 × 20 mg vials before fill loss). Masses can fall numerically inside the patent µg/kg band for some body weights, but route, duration, titration, and identity remain unbridged.

Example online SC titration cumulative exposure

PhaseDaily amountDaysPhase exposureCumulative
Weeks 1–20.5 mg SC147 mg7 mg
Weeks 3–41 mg SC1414 mg21 mg
Weeks 5–61.5 mg SC1421 mg42 mg
Weeks 7–122 mg SC4284 mg126 mg

Livagen reconstitution and vial math

Arithmetic assumes stated vial mass is assay-corrected KEDA — it does not establish identity, sterility, stability, or route suitability. U-100 markings are volume only.

Patent example 10 µg/mL is practical only at the low end of the µg/kg range; top-tier masses need higher validated concentrations.

20 mg vial math

Assumes assay-corrected KEDA — units are volume markings only

Final volume

10.00 mg/mL · 100.0 µg per U-100 unit

0.100 mL · 10.0 units

Target 1000 µg. Arithmetic does not establish IM suitability, solubility at high concentration, or a validated dose.

20 mg vial concentration comparison

Final volumeConcentrationKEDA per U-100 unit
2 mL10 mg/mL100 µg
3 mL6.667 mg/mL66.67 µg
4 mL5 mg/mL50 µg

A generic “28 days refrigerated” rule is not compound-specific stability evidence. HPLC area purity alone is not a quantitative content assay.

Preclinical research dosages

Patent and publications report hepatocyte culture at 5 ng/mL, explants highlighting 20 ng/mL, acute CCl4 models at 1 µg/rat IM, hepatoma work at 1 µg/kg SC × 10 days, and animal toxicology up to multi-mg/kg IM courses. These are model-specific and do not establish a human therapeutic window.

The hepatoma experiment is an animal-model observation — not evidence that Livagen treats cancer.

How might Livagen work?

Themes under investigation include hepatocyte protein synthesis, organotypic explant response, lymphocyte chromatin decondensation (ex vivo), and enkephalinase inhibition (IC50 20 µM ≈ 9.23 µg/mL in vitro — not a plasma target).

Human absorption, bioavailability, half-life, liver distribution, metabolites, dose-response, immunogenicity, and interactions remain unestablished.

Livagen safety

Patent animal toxicology reports no acute deaths up to 5 mg/kg IM in mice and no major pathology in multi-month rat studies — pre-modern reporting standards apply. The human patent example lacks a systematic AE dataset.

An experimental peptide should never delay cause-specific liver testing, antiviral care, alcohol-cessation support, DILI evaluation, or management of decompensated disease.

Safety monitoring

Incidence unknown — never delay cause-specific liver care for an experimental peptide

Human AE incidence
Not established — patent lacks systematic AE table, discontinuation analysis, or long-term follow-up
Injection / product
Local pain, bruising, infection, endotoxin fever, wrong identity, microgram–milligram dosing error
Hepatic monitoring
Experimental peptide must never delay cause-specific liver evaluation or guideline-based care
Higher-uncertainty groups
Pregnancy, children, decompensated cirrhosis, transplant/immunosuppression, active malignancy — inadequately characterized

Route comparison

Route evidence

RouteDirect evidenceMain limitation
IntramuscularPatent human cohort + animal toxicologyNo dose strata, PK, or systematic human AE table
SubcutaneousRat hepatoma experiment; common online routeNo controlled human bridging study
OralTwo-week rat enzyme studyDose absent from accessible abstract; no human oral PK
IV / IN / SLNo reproducible protocol locatedNo route-specific basis

Can Livagen be stacked with other peptides?

No controlled human study establishes Livagen combinations with Epitalon, Vilon, Thymalin, BPC-157, TB-500, GHK-Cu, GH secretagogues, or other liver peptide complexes. The cleanest first study uses one verified KEDA product vs placebo with stable standard care.

Common claims vs evidence

Claim checker

Common Livagen claims vs the evidence record

There is an established Livagen dose

False

No standard dose exists. The patent reports 0.01–100 µg/kg IM daily × 10–40 days without participant-level assignments.

Evidence ladder

Evidence ladder

Overall Livagen dosing evidence: very low for human regimens

LevelWhat existsConfidence
Established clinical useNoneNone
Modern randomized human trialsNone locatedNone
Human administrationOne older patent example (23 + 12)Very low
Human ex-vivo workLymphocyte chromatin / serum enzyme studiesMechanistic, low
Animal researchLiver injury, hepatoma, enzymes, toxicologyPreclinical
Cell and explant researchHepatocyte protein synthesis; explant area indexMechanistic
Community protocolsMultiple vendor/clinic pages (0.2–10 mg/day)Anecdotal

Sport and regulatory context

Livagen is not named individually on the 2026 WADA list. S0 may still apply to non-approved pharmacologic substances. Tested athletes should obtain a ruling from their anti-doping organization before any exposure. No standardized US prescribing dose exists.

Bottom line

Livagen is KEDA (Lys-Glu-Asp-Ala) — not KED, KEDP, or a calf-liver extract. The strongest administered-human source is a patent describing 0.01–100 µg/kg IM once daily for 10–40 days without participant-level dose disclosure.

Cell, explant, and animal studies support biological activity in liver models but do not validate incompatible modern online milligram schedules. A rigorous next step is sequential, placebo-controlled, patent-anchored dose verification with identity testing, validated formulations, sentinel exposure, human PK, and modern cause-specific liver diagnostics.

Treat the patent’s 10,000-fold range as a range to investigate — not a dosing answer. Confirm KEDA identity before trusting any vial chart.

Frequently asked questions

What is the established Livagen dose?

There is no established standard dose. The only located administered-human source reports 0.01–100 µg/kg IM once daily for 10–40 days without revealing individual dose assignments.

Is Livagen KED or KEDA?

Livagen is KEDA: Lys-Glu-Asp-Ala. KED is a different tripeptide.

Is Livagen the same as Ventvil?

No. Livagen is one defined synthetic tetrapeptide. Ventvil is a heterogeneous calf-liver polypeptide complex.

What dose did each patent participant receive?

The patent does not say. It gives only the overall range of 0.01–100 µg/kg and a 10–40-day course related to severity.

Is subcutaneous Livagen equivalent to intramuscular?

Unknown. No human route-bridging or bioavailability study was located.

What is Livagen’s half-life?

Unknown in humans. Numerical half-lives shown by online calculators are modeled or assumed unless they link to a measured PK study.

Does Livagen regenerate the liver?

Rat cell, explant, and injury models suggest effects on protein synthesis and recovery markers. Human liver regeneration or fibrosis reversal has not been demonstrated.

Does Livagen reverse aging?

No. Ex-vivo chromatin changes in lymphocytes are mechanistic observations, not evidence of longer life or clinical rejuvenation.

Is Livagen an anticancer peptide?

No clinical evidence supports that description. The patent reports one transplanted rat-hepatoma experiment.

Can a cycle be repeated every few months?

No controlled study establishes a repeat interval or cumulative long-term safety. Repeat exposure requires its own protocol.

Is Livagen prohibited in tested sport?

It is not named individually on the 2026 WADA list, but S0 may apply. Obtain a sport-specific determination before use.

References

Latest Research on Livagen

Stay updated on the latest peptide research

New studies and guides delivered to your inbox.