Updated August 2026
Livagen Dosage: Human Patent Research, Protocol, and Reconstitution
Research note: Livagen is the defined synthetic tetrapeptide Lys-Glu-Asp-Ala (KEDA). Its only located administered-human dose report is an older patent example, not a modern peer-reviewed clinical trial. The complete protocol below is a prospective research design for qualified investigators — not a personal treatment plan.
Clearest human record: 0.01–100 µg/kg IM once daily for 10–40 days in a US patent describing 23 adults with “chronic persistent hepatitis” vs 12 conventional-care comparators. The patent does not reveal each participant’s dose, dose-group sizes, randomization/blinding detail, or a formal adverse-event analysis.
For a 70 kg participant, that range equals 0.7 µg to 7 mg/day. Modern online schedules (200 µg SC × 10 days; 0.5–2 mg SC titration; 5–10 mg IM × 10 days) are mutually inconsistent and are not clinical-trial doses — one reviewed page even mislabels Livagen as KEDP.
Most defensible next study: sequential, placebo-controlled dose verification across fixed cohorts at 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 µg/kg IM for 10 days with sentinel dosing and safety gates — a proposed design inside the patent range, not the patent’s actual assignments.
Livagen dosage in 30 seconds
| Question | Research summary |
|---|---|
| Identity | KEDA · Lys-Glu-Asp-Ala · ≈461.48 g/mol free peptide |
| ≠ | KED · KEDP · Ventvil / liver extracts |
| Patent human amount | 0.01–100 µg/kg once daily IM × 10–40 days |
| Participant-level dose | Not disclosed |
| 70 kg daily span | 0.7 µg – 7 mg/day |
| Modern online range | 0.2–10 mg/day (incompatible SC/IM schedules) |
| Human PK | Not established |
| Peer-reviewed liver benefit | Not established |
What is Livagen?
Livagen is a chemically defined four-amino-acid peptide (H-Lys-Glu-Asp-Ala-OH, KEDA) from the short peptide-bioregulator research program associated with Khavinson and colleagues. Primary patent US7101854B2 describes synthesis, parenteral formulation, animal work, and one human clinical example.
Free-peptide formula C18H31N5O9, MW 461.48. Patent example finished product was associated with acetate; salt, moisture, and assay basis change gross mass vs free-peptide-equivalent mass.
Identity gate
Confirm KEDA — not KED, KEDP, Ventvil, or unlabeled combination products
Matches Livagen identity on this page
Defined tetrapeptide H-Lys-Glu-Asp-Ala-OH (~461.48 g/mol free peptide). Confirm sequence by MS/MS, free-peptide-equivalent assay, salt/water basis, sterility, and endotoxin before trusting any unit chart.
Common identity errors
| Name or label | What it is | Equivalent to pure KEDA? |
|---|---|---|
| Livagen / KEDA | Defined Lys-Glu-Asp-Ala | Yes, if verified analytically |
| KED | Lys-Glu-Asp tripeptide | No |
| KEDP | Lys-Glu-Asp-Pro tetrapeptide | No |
| Ventvil | Calf-liver polypeptide complex | No |
| Oral “Livagen” combination | May mix KEDA + other ingredients | No — separate exposures |
Has Livagen been tested in humans?
[US7101854B2 Example 7](https://patents.google.com/patent/US7101854B2/en) is the only located source that clearly describes Livagen administration to living humans: 23 patients aged 32–53 with historical “chronic persistent hepatitis,” 0.01–100 µg/kg IM once daily for 10–40 days, vs 12 conventionally treated comparators.
The historical diagnosis requires caution — a modern replication needs cause-specific staging. Patent pre/post tables report symptom and lab changes in the active cohort (e.g., bilirubin, ALT, IgM marked significant in the source) but do not clearly report comparator outcomes or between-group analysis.
Human evidence status
Patent-reported IM cohort — not a modern peer-reviewed dose-finding trial
- Standardized US prescribing dose
- None
- Clearest administered-human source
- US7101854B2 Example 7 (patent)
- Patent amount
- 0.01–100 µg/kg once daily
- Patent route / duration
- IM · 10–40 days
- Participant-level dose disclosed?
- No
- Modern peer-reviewed RCT
- None located
- Human pharmacokinetics
- Not established
- Demonstrated peer-reviewed liver benefit
- Not established
- Modern online range reviewed
- 0.2–10 mg/day across incompatible SC/IM schedules
What the patent evidence does and does not show
| Supports | Does not establish |
|---|---|
| KEDA reportedly administered IM to humans | A replicated peer-reviewed clinical benefit |
| 10–40-day daily schedule used | Which duration any individual received |
| Administered range 0.01–100 µg/kg | Which dose any participant received |
| Comparator group mentioned | Randomization, blinding, or matched concurrent care |
Human-cell / ex-vivo chromatin and enkephalinase studies are not dosing studies — they do not establish absorption, systemic dose, or clinical effect.
Livagen research dosage landscape
Patent and community amounts diverge because sellers start from 20 mg vial arithmetic, often substitute SC for patent IM without bridging data, and copy protocol language across sites. Nominal vial fill, salt mass, and free-peptide mass are frequently conflated.
Evidence split
Patent example vs proposed dose verification vs modern online schedules
Patent-reported human example
Patent-controlled · not a modern RCT
- Amount
- 0.01–100 µg/kg (individual dose unknown)
- Route
- Intramuscular
- Frequency
- Once daily
- Duration
- 10–40 days (by severity; individual unknown)
- N
- 23 active + 12 conventional-care comparator
- Key gap
- No dose strata, blinding detail, or AE table
Proposed dose-verification design
Prospective Phase 1b-style framework
- Cohorts
- 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 100 µg/kg
- Route
- IM (patent-anchored)
- Duration
- 10 consecutive days
- Escalation
- Between cohorts only + safety gates
- Controls
- Placebo + sentinel dosing
- Claim
- Safety/PK/exploratory markers — not efficacy
Modern online schedules
Anecdotal · mutually inconsistent
- Low page
- 200 µg SC daily × 10 days (some mislabel KEDP)
- Titration page
- 0.5 → 2 mg SC over 8–12 weeks (~126 mg)
- High page
- 5–10 mg IM daily × 10 days
- Route issue
- Often SC without IM bridging study
- Identity issue
- Nominal vial mass ≠ assay-corrected KEDA
- Primary source
- None located for these schedules
Reported dosage landscape
| Source | Amount | Route | Duration | Classification |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patent human example | 0.01–100 µg/kg daily | IM | 10–40 days | Patent-reported human administration |
| Low online protocol | 200 µg daily | SC | 10 days | Anecdotal (some mislabel KEDP) |
| Gradual online titration | 0.5 → 2 mg daily | SC | 8–12 weeks | Vendor/educational; no dose-finding source |
| High online convention | 5–10 mg daily | IM | 10 days | Vendor/educational; no controlled support |
Patent range by body weight (arithmetic only)
The following converts µg/kg tiers to daily mass. It is not personalization. The range spans four orders of magnitude — “use the middle” is not a scientifically valid dose-selection method.
Patent range math
µg/kg → daily mass — arithmetic only, not a dosing recommendation
Body weight
Patent / verification tier
Daily
70 µg
10-day total
700 µg
40-day total
2.80 mg
Patent range spans 10,000-fold. Participant-level doses were not disclosed. Do not “pick the middle.”
Complete patent-anchored dose-verification protocol
Prospective Phase 1b-style framework for pure KEDA in adults with stable, compensated, cause-specific chronic liver disease. Preserves patent route, frequency, range, and minimum duration while adding PK, sentinel dosing, and stop rules the patent omitted.
Cohorts: 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 100 µg/kg IM once daily × 10 days. Escalation between cohorts only. Primary endpoints are safety/tolerability — not powered efficacy. IRB/ethics, hepatology, pharmacy, and independent safety review required before use.
Dose-verification framework
10-day IM cohorts · sentinel dosing · between-cohort escalation only
1–10
Assigned tier µg/kg IM once daily
No within-participant escalation; sentinel dosing; PK on days 1 and 10
Primary analysis is descriptive safety — not proof of liver repair. Missed doses are skipped (not doubled). No automatic repeat cycle.
Fixed-volume scheme example (0.01 mL/kg admin volume)
| Cohort | Dose | Concentration | 70 kg amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.01 µg/kg | 1 µg/mL | 0.7 µg |
| 2 | 0.1 µg/kg | 10 µg/mL | 7 µg |
| 3 | 1 µg/kg | 100 µg/mL | 70 µg |
| 4 | 10 µg/kg | 1 mg/mL | 700 µg |
| 5 | 100 µg/kg | 10 mg/mL | 7 mg |
The patent’s example 10 µg/mL solution fits Cohort 2 under this scheme but cannot deliver the top tier at a practical volume (700 mL for 7 mg). Higher concentrations need new validation. Do not double missed doses, escalate within a course, or start automatic repeat cycles.
Documented community titration (not a recommendation)
One circulating 12-week 20 mg-vial schedule escalates 0.5 → 1 → 1.5 → 2 mg SC daily, totaling ~126 mg nominal peptide over 84 days (≈6.3 × 20 mg vials before fill loss). Masses can fall numerically inside the patent µg/kg band for some body weights, but route, duration, titration, and identity remain unbridged.
Example online SC titration cumulative exposure
| Phase | Daily amount | Days | Phase exposure | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1–2 | 0.5 mg SC | 14 | 7 mg | 7 mg |
| Weeks 3–4 | 1 mg SC | 14 | 14 mg | 21 mg |
| Weeks 5–6 | 1.5 mg SC | 14 | 21 mg | 42 mg |
| Weeks 7–12 | 2 mg SC | 42 | 84 mg | 126 mg |
Livagen reconstitution and vial math
Arithmetic assumes stated vial mass is assay-corrected KEDA — it does not establish identity, sterility, stability, or route suitability. U-100 markings are volume only.
Patent example 10 µg/mL is practical only at the low end of the µg/kg range; top-tier masses need higher validated concentrations.
20 mg vial math
Assumes assay-corrected KEDA — units are volume markings only
Final volume
10.00 mg/mL · 100.0 µg per U-100 unit
0.100 mL · 10.0 units
Target 1000 µg. Arithmetic does not establish IM suitability, solubility at high concentration, or a validated dose.
20 mg vial concentration comparison
| Final volume | Concentration | KEDA per U-100 unit |
|---|---|---|
| 2 mL | 10 mg/mL | 100 µg |
| 3 mL | 6.667 mg/mL | 66.67 µg |
| 4 mL | 5 mg/mL | 50 µg |
A generic “28 days refrigerated” rule is not compound-specific stability evidence. HPLC area purity alone is not a quantitative content assay.
Preclinical research dosages
Patent and publications report hepatocyte culture at 5 ng/mL, explants highlighting 20 ng/mL, acute CCl4 models at 1 µg/rat IM, hepatoma work at 1 µg/kg SC × 10 days, and animal toxicology up to multi-mg/kg IM courses. These are model-specific and do not establish a human therapeutic window.
The hepatoma experiment is an animal-model observation — not evidence that Livagen treats cancer.
How might Livagen work?
Themes under investigation include hepatocyte protein synthesis, organotypic explant response, lymphocyte chromatin decondensation (ex vivo), and enkephalinase inhibition (IC50 20 µM ≈ 9.23 µg/mL in vitro — not a plasma target).
Human absorption, bioavailability, half-life, liver distribution, metabolites, dose-response, immunogenicity, and interactions remain unestablished.
Livagen safety
Patent animal toxicology reports no acute deaths up to 5 mg/kg IM in mice and no major pathology in multi-month rat studies — pre-modern reporting standards apply. The human patent example lacks a systematic AE dataset.
An experimental peptide should never delay cause-specific liver testing, antiviral care, alcohol-cessation support, DILI evaluation, or management of decompensated disease.
Safety monitoring
Incidence unknown — never delay cause-specific liver care for an experimental peptide
- Human AE incidence
- Not established — patent lacks systematic AE table, discontinuation analysis, or long-term follow-up
- Injection / product
- Local pain, bruising, infection, endotoxin fever, wrong identity, microgram–milligram dosing error
- Hepatic monitoring
- Experimental peptide must never delay cause-specific liver evaluation or guideline-based care
- Higher-uncertainty groups
- Pregnancy, children, decompensated cirrhosis, transplant/immunosuppression, active malignancy — inadequately characterized
Route comparison
Route evidence
| Route | Direct evidence | Main limitation |
|---|---|---|
| Intramuscular | Patent human cohort + animal toxicology | No dose strata, PK, or systematic human AE table |
| Subcutaneous | Rat hepatoma experiment; common online route | No controlled human bridging study |
| Oral | Two-week rat enzyme study | Dose absent from accessible abstract; no human oral PK |
| IV / IN / SL | No reproducible protocol located | No route-specific basis |
Can Livagen be stacked with other peptides?
No controlled human study establishes Livagen combinations with Epitalon, Vilon, Thymalin, BPC-157, TB-500, GHK-Cu, GH secretagogues, or other liver peptide complexes. The cleanest first study uses one verified KEDA product vs placebo with stable standard care.
Common claims vs evidence
Claim checker
Common Livagen claims vs the evidence record
There is an established Livagen dose
False
No standard dose exists. The patent reports 0.01–100 µg/kg IM daily × 10–40 days without participant-level assignments.
Evidence ladder
Evidence ladder
Overall Livagen dosing evidence: very low for human regimens
| Level | What exists | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Established clinical use | None | None |
| Modern randomized human trials | None located | None |
| Human administration | One older patent example (23 + 12) | Very low |
| Human ex-vivo work | Lymphocyte chromatin / serum enzyme studies | Mechanistic, low |
| Animal research | Liver injury, hepatoma, enzymes, toxicology | Preclinical |
| Cell and explant research | Hepatocyte protein synthesis; explant area index | Mechanistic |
| Community protocols | Multiple vendor/clinic pages (0.2–10 mg/day) | Anecdotal |
Sport and regulatory context
Livagen is not named individually on the 2026 WADA list. S0 may still apply to non-approved pharmacologic substances. Tested athletes should obtain a ruling from their anti-doping organization before any exposure. No standardized US prescribing dose exists.
Bottom line
Livagen is KEDA (Lys-Glu-Asp-Ala) — not KED, KEDP, or a calf-liver extract. The strongest administered-human source is a patent describing 0.01–100 µg/kg IM once daily for 10–40 days without participant-level dose disclosure.
Cell, explant, and animal studies support biological activity in liver models but do not validate incompatible modern online milligram schedules. A rigorous next step is sequential, placebo-controlled, patent-anchored dose verification with identity testing, validated formulations, sentinel exposure, human PK, and modern cause-specific liver diagnostics.
Treat the patent’s 10,000-fold range as a range to investigate — not a dosing answer. Confirm KEDA identity before trusting any vial chart.
Frequently asked questions
What is the established Livagen dose?
There is no established standard dose. The only located administered-human source reports 0.01–100 µg/kg IM once daily for 10–40 days without revealing individual dose assignments.
Is Livagen KED or KEDA?
Livagen is KEDA: Lys-Glu-Asp-Ala. KED is a different tripeptide.
Is Livagen the same as Ventvil?
No. Livagen is one defined synthetic tetrapeptide. Ventvil is a heterogeneous calf-liver polypeptide complex.
What dose did each patent participant receive?
The patent does not say. It gives only the overall range of 0.01–100 µg/kg and a 10–40-day course related to severity.
Is subcutaneous Livagen equivalent to intramuscular?
Unknown. No human route-bridging or bioavailability study was located.
What is Livagen’s half-life?
Unknown in humans. Numerical half-lives shown by online calculators are modeled or assumed unless they link to a measured PK study.
Does Livagen regenerate the liver?
Rat cell, explant, and injury models suggest effects on protein synthesis and recovery markers. Human liver regeneration or fibrosis reversal has not been demonstrated.
Does Livagen reverse aging?
No. Ex-vivo chromatin changes in lymphocytes are mechanistic observations, not evidence of longer life or clinical rejuvenation.
Is Livagen an anticancer peptide?
No clinical evidence supports that description. The patent reports one transplanted rat-hepatoma experiment.
Can a cycle be repeated every few months?
No controlled study establishes a repeat interval or cumulative long-term safety. Repeat exposure requires its own protocol.
Is Livagen prohibited in tested sport?
It is not named individually on the 2026 WADA list, but S0 may apply. Obtain a sport-specific determination before use.
References
Khavinson VK
US7101854B2 — Tetrapeptide stimulating hepatocyte functional activityPrimary patent: identity, formulation, animal work, human example.
PubChem
Livagen CID 87919683Compound identity record.
Brodskii VI et al.
Protein-synthesis rhythm in rat hepatocytes and Livagen5 ng/mL culture exposure — preclinical.
Khavinson VK et al.
Livagen peptide and chromatin activation in lymphocytes from old peopleEx-vivo mechanistic work — not systemic dosing.
Kost NV et al.
Livagen and Epitalon on enkephalin-degrading enzymesIn-vitro IC50 20 µM — not a plasma target.
Kuznik BI et al.
Polypeptide liver complex and tetrapeptide KEDA reviewDistinguishes Ventvil extract from KEDA.
WADA
2026 Prohibited ListNot named individually; S0 may apply.