ERR Agonist Research (Not a Peptide)

SLU-PP-332

Dosage & Dose Escalation Guide

Preclinical small-molecule pan-ERR agonist—not a peptide. Mouse endurance and metabolic results, no human dose or trial, SLU-PP-915 kept separate, safety unknowns emphasized.

★★★★★4.3(480 reviews)Not FDA Approved
  • Small Molecule
  • ERR Agonist
  • Exercise Mimetic Research
  • Preclinical Only
Compare Providers
  • Not a peptide

    Synthetic small molecule C18H14N2O2 (290.3 g/mol). Pan-ERR agonist with highest reported potency at ERRα.

  • No human dose

    Mouse IP doses of 25–50 mg/kg are research exposures — not human protocols. Lacks oral bioavailability.

  • ≠ SLU-PP-915

    Orally active successor is a chemically distinct analog. Results cannot transfer between compounds.

How It Works

SLU-PP-332 activates ERRα/β/γ nuclear receptors that partner with PGC-1 coactivators to drive mitochondrial biogenesis, OXPHOS, and fatty-acid oxidation programs. Skeletal-muscle endurance was ERRα-dependent; heart-failure cardioprotection implicated ERRγ.

ERRα (muscle)

  • Strongest reported reporter-assay potency
  • Required for acute endurance benefit
  • Ddit4 / Pdk4 / oxidative fibers

ERRγ (heart)

  • Principal cardiac mediator in TAC studies
  • Fatty-acid / mitochondrial programs
  • EF ↑, fibrosis ↓; hypertrophy not prevented

Oral / product limits

  • Parent lacks oral bioavailability
  • Mouse IP ≠ human SC/oral
  • Online products ≠ clinical-grade drug

Result

Mouse Endurance Signal

No Human Efficacy Data

Safety Unknown

Expected Results Over Time

Updated August 2026

SLU-PP-332 Dosage, Results, Side Effects & Exercise-Mimetic Research

Research-status alert: SLU-PP-332 is not a peptide. It is a synthetic small-molecule agonist of the estrogen-related receptors ERRα, ERRβ, and ERRγ. It is an experimental laboratory compound with no FDA-approved indication, no established human dosage, no published human pharmacokinetic study, and no registered human trial identified. Every efficacy result below comes from cells or animals unless explicitly labeled otherwise.

SLU-PP-332 is a preclinical pan-ERR agonist designed to activate transcriptional programs involved in mitochondrial energy production, fatty-acid oxidation, and aerobic exercise adaptation. In small mouse experiments, it increased oxidative type IIa muscle fibers and treadmill endurance; in obese mice, it increased energy expenditure and reduced fat accumulation without reducing food intake or increasing spontaneous activity.

Those findings do not mean that SLU-PP-332 is an “exercise pill” for people. The original compound lacks oral bioavailability, the animal studies used intraperitoneal injection, and no clinical trial has established a safe dose, side-effect frequency, weight-loss effect, athletic benefit, or long-term risk in humans. A different analog, SLU-PP-915, was later optimized for oral activity.

This page is an evidence reference, not a dosing recommendation. It does not include a human dose calculator, reconstitution guide, or week-by-week protocol.

30-Second Summary

QuestionEvidence-based answer
What is it?A synthetic small molecule and laboratory pan-ERR agonist—not a peptide, hormone, SARM, or approved drug
Main mechanismActivates ERRα/β/γ; skeletal-muscle exercise-response signal was ERRα-dependent in knockout experiments
Administration studiedPrimarily intraperitoneal injection in mice; cell studies used micromolar concentrations
Human dosageNone established
Main mouse doses30 mg/kg once (exposure); 50 mg/kg once or BID (muscle/metabolic); 25 mg/kg regimens (heart/kidney)
Strongest resultSingle 50 mg/kg dose ↑ treadmill time ~70% and distance ~45% vs vehicle — not reproduced in humans
Weight resultDIO mice ~12% body-weight loss over 28 days; ~1/10 fat gain vs controls; intake/activity unchanged
Human side effectsUnknown; no human safety dataset
Oral bioavailabilityOriginal investigators reported SLU-PP-332 lacks oral bioavailability
FDA statusNot FDA approved for any indication
Human trialsNone identified in ClinicalTrials.gov exact-name search as of August 21, 2026

What Is SLU-PP-332?

SLU-PP-332 is a research compound developed as a pharmacologic tool for activating estrogen-related receptors. Its name is sometimes placed beside peptides by research-chemical sellers, but chemically it is a small organic molecule (C18H14N2O2, 290.3 g/mol).

“Estrogen-related” does not mean estrogen. ERRs are orphan nuclear receptors, not ERα/ERβ. The name does not establish that SLU-PP-332 raises or blocks estrogen, causes gynecomastia, or shares estrogen-therapy risks.

PropertyDetail
Compound classSynthetic small molecule
Chemical name4-hydroxy-N-[(Z)-naphthalen-2-ylmethylideneamino]benzamide
Molecular formulaC18H14N2O2
Molecular weight290.3 g/mol
Primary targetsERRα, ERRβ, ERRγ
Reported EC5098 nM ERRα · 230 nM ERRβ · 430 nM ERRγ
Key limitationPoor oral bioavailability; human pharmacology uncharacterized

SLU-PP-332 Dosage Used in Preclinical Studies

There is no established human dosage. No controlled human study has determined a starting dose, maintenance dose, maximum dose, escalation schedule, route, half-life, therapeutic window, or monitoring plan. Online “cycles” in µg or mg are not clinical protocols.

Mouse mg/kg cannot be converted into a human protocol. Even an allometric “human-equivalent dose” is only an early toxicology-planning estimate — not a recommended dose. Studies used IP injection, which does not map cleanly to oral, SC, IM, or IV use in people.

  • No legitimate human dose-escalation chart exists. Titration requires human PK, tolerability, and exposure-response data — SLU-PP-332 has none.
  • Some websites infer a 1–2 hour half-life from two mouse sampling points. That should not be presented as a validated half-life analysis.

Preclinical protocol timeline

Separate experiments — not a human titration plan

Animal research only — do not convert to a human dose.

  1. Exposure sampling

    Single 30 mg/kg IP → plasma/muscle at 2 h and 6 h

    Demonstrated measurable exposure — not a validated half-life study

  2. Acute endurance

    Single 50 mg/kg IP → treadmill test 1 h later

    ~70% longer running time; ~45% farther distance (n=6/group)

  3. Muscle / metabolic programs

    50 mg/kg IP twice daily → 10–28 day programs

    Muscle phenotype, transcriptomics, DIO/chow metabolic studies

  4. Disease models

    25 mg/kg IP → 6-week heart or 8-week kidney studies

    TAC heart failure; aging-kidney biomarkers

SLU-PP-332 Results and Effectiveness

The strongest quantitative outcome is acute mouse treadmill endurance. Obesity models showed reduced fat accumulation without lower food intake. Glucose findings are model-dependent: improved in metabolically impaired obese mice, not in healthy chow-fed mice.

There is no evidence that SLU-PP-332 is an anabolic muscle-growth drug. It shifted muscle toward a more oxidative, fatigue-resistant phenotype. “Exercise mimetic” is a mechanistic research label — not proof of exercise equivalence.

Simple view / full preclinical arms

  • Endurance increased in mice (~70% time / ~45% distance acutely).
  • Fat accumulation fell in obese mice; intake and activity unchanged in DIO.
  • Glucose improved in impaired obesity models — not in healthy chow-fed mice.
  • Human efficacy and safety are unknown.

Mouse endurance results chart

Acute 50 mg/kg IP — strongest quantitative outcome

Running time

Vehicle
100%
SLU-PP-332
170%

Distance

Vehicle
100%
SLU-PP-332
145%
Dose / timing
50 mg/kg IP once, 1 hour pre-test
Sample
n=6 per group · Male mice

Mechanistic annotation: Endurance benefit absent in skeletal-muscle ERRα knockout

EndpointVehicleSLU-PP-332
Running time (normalized)100%~170%
Distance (normalized)100%~145%

Metabolic Results by Mouse Model

Keep chow-fed, DIO, and ob/ob results separate. The 12% weight figure is a mouse result and should not be compared numerically with clinical weight-loss trials of approved drugs.

Metabolic results explorer

Keep chow-fed, DIO, and ob/ob results separate

Model
DIO (HFD, thermoneutral)
Duration / dose
28 days · 50 mg/kg IP BID
Body weight
~12% body-weight loss highlighted
Fat mass
Gained ~1/10 as much fat as vehicle
Lean mass
No significant change reported
Food intake
Unchanged
Locomotor activity
Unchanged
RER / FAO
Lower RER; ↑ fatty-acid oxidation
Energy expenditure
Higher energy expenditure
Glucose
Improved GTT / insulin sensitivity
Liver
Less hepatic lipid / lower TG content

Evidence Across Models

Filter by experimental system. The Human Data tab states the gap directly: no interventional human evidence identified.

Evidence-level navigator

Keep cell, mouse, and human evidence from blending

  • Cells

    C2C12 / primary myocytes

    N/A · Cell assays · Commonly 10 μM (gene expression / mitochondrial assays)

    Endpoint: Pdk4, respiration, MitoTracker; ERRα-dependent Ddit4/Slc25a25

    Target engagement and mechanism

    A cell concentration is not a dose and does not predict human exposure

    View source →
  • Healthy mice

    Male C57BL/6J mice

    Male · n=6/group (acute treadmill) · 50 mg/kg IP once, 1 h before test

    Endpoint: Treadmill running time and distance

    ~70% longer time, ~45% farther distance vs vehicle

    Null / caveat: Benefit absent in skeletal-muscle ERRα knockout

    Small acute mouse experiment — not a human sports trial

    View source →
  • Healthy mice

    Male C57BL/6J mice

    Male · Generally 6–8/group · 50 mg/kg IP twice daily up to 13 days

    Endpoint: Oxidative fibers, mitochondrial markers, grip strength

    More SDH-positive / type IIa markers; exercise-like transcription

    Null / caveat: Positioned as endurance mimetic — not anabolic hypertrophy

    Oxidative remodeling ≠ human muscle growth

    View source →
  • Obesity mice

    Male DIO mice, thermoneutral, HFD

    Male · Small groups · 50 mg/kg IP twice daily × 28 days

    Endpoint: Body weight, fat mass, calorimetry, glucose, liver fat

    ~12% body-weight loss highlighted; ~1/10 fat gain vs controls

    Null / caveat: Food intake and locomotor activity unchanged

    Mouse result — not a forecast of 12% human weight loss

    View source →
  • Healthy mice

    Male C57BL/6 chow-fed, thermoneutral

    Male · Small groups · 50 mg/kg IP twice daily × 28 days

    Endpoint: Glucose / metabolic endpoints

    Metabolic measures collected under controlled housing

    Null / caveat: Did NOT improve glucose metabolism in healthy chow-fed mice

    Model-dependent glucose effects — do not overstate blood-sugar claims

    View source →
  • Obesity mice

    Male ob/ob mice, thermoneutral

    Male · Small groups · 50 mg/kg IP twice daily; ~12 days (methods) / 15 days (figure legend)

    Endpoint: Body composition, EE, FAO, liver histology

    Energy expenditure / fatty-acid oxidation / adiposity signals

    Null / caveat: 12- vs 15-day timing discrepancy preserved

    Leptin-deficient model — not clinical obesity treatment evidence

    View source →
  • Heart-failure mice

    TAC pressure-overload mice

    Mixed program · Disease-model cohorts · 25 mg/kg IP twice daily × 6 weeks

    Endpoint: EF, fibrosis, survival, metabolism

    Improved EF, less fibrosis, higher survival vs TAC vehicle

    Null / caveat: Cardiac hypertrophy not prevented; some analyses pooled with SLU-PP-915

    Disease model only — not human heart-failure treatment

    View source →
  • Aging-kidney mice

    21-month-old male C57BL/6

    Male · Aged-mouse cohorts · 25 mg/kg/day IP × 8 weeks

    Endpoint: Albuminuria, podocytes, mitochondria, inflammation

    Improved age-associated renal injury / mitochondrial / inflammatory markers

    Biomarker study — no human CKD outcome data

    View source →
  • Human data

    · · None identified

    Endpoint:

    No interventional human evidence identified

    Null / caveat: ClinicalTrials.gov exact-name search returned zero studies (Aug 21, 2026)

    Human liver microsomes / tissue observations ≠ dosing humans

    View source →

SLU-PP-332 Side Effects and Safety

Human side-effect rates are unknown. There are no human trial arms from which to calculate nausea, headache, heart-rate change, liver injury, serious events, or discontinuation. Anecdotes cannot establish incidence or causality.

Mouse efficacy studies reported no overt toxicity in some regimens and only relatively minor liver-enzyme changes in the metabolic study. “No severe effects observed” must never be rendered as “proven safe.”

Safety-knowledge matrix

Most human cells remain Unknown

DomainEfficacy miceFormal toxHuman data
Cardiac rhythm / QTNot a formal EP studyNot identifiedUnknown
Blood pressure / hemodynamicsLimited observationsNot identifiedUnknown
Liver injuryMinor enzyme changes reportedNot identifiedUnknown
KidneyAging-kidney biomarkers studiedNot identifiedUnknown
Reproductive / developmentalNot establishedNot identifiedUnknown
Cancer / carcinogenicityNo conclusion from short efficacy studiesNot identifiedUnknown
GenotoxicityNo public package identifiedUnknown
Immune effectsKidney inflammatory pathways implicatedNot identifiedUnknown
Drug interactionsNot identifiedUnknown
Withdrawal / reboundNot characterizedNot identifiedUnknown
Product sterility / purityLab compoundUnknown — vendor CoA ≠ approval

2026 metabolism research ≠ human safety study

A 2026 laboratory study incubated SLU-PP-332 with human liver microsomes and S9 fractions and identified nine in-vitro transformation products. This helps anti-doping laboratories anticipate analytical targets. It does not show how a living person absorbs, distributes, clears, or tolerates the compound.

How SLU-PP-332 Works

SLU-PP-332 enters cells and activates ERR nuclear receptors — gene-control switches in high-energy tissues. In mouse skeletal muscle, it turned on part of the genetic program associated with aerobic exercise, increased mitochondrial machinery, shifted fibers toward a more oxidative type, and increased fat use as fuel.

Tissue specificity matters: acute skeletal-muscle endurance was ERRα-dependent, while cardioprotection in the heart-failure model implicated ERRγ as the principal mediator.

ERR mechanism visualization

SLU-PP-332 → ERRs → tissue-specific programs → mouse outcomes

SLU-PP-332 → ERRα / ERRβ / ERRγ → gene transcription → mitochondrial / OXPHOS and fatty-acid programs

Tissue / dependency
Skeletal muscle · ERRα-dependent (knockout)
Pathway
ERRα → Ddit4 / Pdk4 / oxidative fibers → endurance
Evidence type
Direct genetic evidence for acute endurance benefit

SLU-PP-332 vs Similar Compounds

Cross-comparisons describe mechanism and evidence stage — not head-to-head human efficacy.

CompoundClass / mechanismHuman evidenceKey distinction
SLU-PP-332Small-molecule ERRα/β/γ agonistNoneLacks oral bioavailability; foundational preclinical tool
SLU-PP-915Chemically distinct pan-ERR agonistNo clinical efficacy identifiedOrally active in mice — not another name for 332
GW501516 (cardarine)PPARδ agonistLimited early human metabolic work; not approvedDifferent receptor; carcinogenicity concerns
AICARAMPK-pathway activatorPharmacology in other contexts; not approved exercise mimeticEnergy-sensing pathway, not direct ERR agonism
MOTS-cMitochondrial-derived peptideEarly/limited human researchActually a peptide; different target network
Aerobic exerciseMulti-system physiologic interventionExtensive human outcome evidenceBenefits a single receptor agonist cannot reproduce

SLU-PP-332 vs SLU-PP-915 identity card

Prevents the most consequential molecule mix-up

Results cannot be transferred between compounds.

FeatureSLU-PP-332SLU-PP-915
RelationshipParent research tool / lead-series compoundChemically distinct analog
ERR activityPan-ERR; ERRα-preferring in reporter assayPan-ERR agonist
Oral bioavailabilityLacking (per 2026 paper)Demonstrated in mice
Mouse exercise effectImproved after IP dosingSimilar IP effect; retained activity orally
Human trialsNone identifiedNone establishing clinical efficacy identified
Correct statementWorked by IP injection in miceOptimized for oral mouse exposure

Claim Checker

Common search claims versus what the evidence actually supports.

Claim checker

High-value AEO module for common searches

  • SLU-PP-332 is a peptide

    False

    Synthetic small molecule C18H14N2O2 (290.3 g/mol) — not an amino-acid chain

  • It is an oral exercise pill

    Unsupported / misleading

    Parent lacks oral bioavailability; SLU-PP-915 is a distinct orally active analog

  • It causes 12% weight loss

    Mouse-only

    DIO mice, 50 mg/kg IP BID × 28 days — not a human forecast

  • It increases human endurance 70%

    False extrapolation

    70% longer running time was an acute mouse treadmill result (n=6)

  • It builds muscle

    Unsupported

    Oxidative type IIa fiber shift is not hypertrophy or anabolism

  • It is safe because mice had no side effects

    False inference

    No formal human safety data; efficacy studies ≠ toxicology package

  • It is cardarine

    False

    ERR agonist vs PPARδ agonist (GW501516) — different chemistry and risks

  • It has a known 1–2 hour half-life

    Not established

    Only 2- and 6-hour mouse concentration sampling after IP dosing

Clinical and Preclinical Evidence

Skeletal-muscle exercise response (Billon 2023)

Design: Cells + male mice · Dose: 30–50 mg/kg IP · Result: Oxidative phenotype; ~70% longer / ~45% farther treadmill running · Limit: Small male-mouse groups; no human data

Obesity and metabolic syndrome (Billon 2024)

Design: Chow, DIO, and ob/ob mice at thermoneutrality · Dose: 50 mg/kg IP BID · Result: ↑ EE/FAO, ↓ fat accumulation; glucose improved only in impaired models · Limit: Very small groups; model-dependent glucose

Pressure-overload heart failure (Xu 2024)

Design: TAC mice · Dose: 25 mg/kg IP BID × 6 weeks · Result: ↑ EF, ↓ fibrosis, ↑ survival; hypertrophy not prevented · Limit: Some analyses pooled SLU-PP-332 and SLU-PP-915

Aging kidney (Wang 2023)

Design: 21-month-old male mice · Dose: 25 mg/kg/day IP × 8 weeks · Result: Improved albuminuria, podocyte, mitochondrial, inflammatory markers · Limit: Biomarkers, not clinical CKD outcomes

Orally active successor (Billon 2026)

Compound: SLU-PP-915 · Result: Oral exercise-mimetic activity in mice; paper states SLU-PP-332 lacks oral bioavailability · Limit: Applies to 915 and mice — not oral 332 in humans

Research timeline

2023–2026 preclinical program — still no human trial

  1. 2023

    Exercise-response / endurance paper

    First peer-reviewed ACS Chem Biol program: oxidative muscle phenotype and acute treadmill benefit.

  2. 2023

    Aging-kidney paper

    Aged-mouse albuminuria, podocyte, mitochondrial, and inflammatory markers.

  3. 2024

    Metabolic syndrome + heart failure

    JPET obesity/metabolic program and Circulation TAC cardioprotection studies.

  4. 2026

    SLU-PP-915 oral analog

    Chemically distinct, orally active successor; paper states SLU-PP-332 lacks oral bioavailability.

  5. 2026

    In-vitro metabolism / anti-doping

    Nine putative metabolites in human liver microsomes/S9 — analytical targets, not human PK.

  6. Aug 2026

    Current status

    No human SLU-PP-332 trial identified; not FDA approved.

Evidence Quality

Evidence typeStrengthWhy
Human randomized trialsNoneNo human dosing study identified
Mouse efficacy studiesEarly but coherentSmall groups, mostly male, specialized models
Genetic target validationModerate preclinicalERRα muscle KO; ERRγ cardiac dependency
PharmacokineticsVery limitedMouse concentrations at 2 and 6 hours only
Safety toxicologyInsufficientNot a full regulatory toxicology package
FDA approvalNoneNo approved label or indication

Bottom line: Promising mechanistic and animal evidence; no clinical evidence. Discuss as a preclinical ERR research tool — not a proven obesity medication, endurance enhancer, anti-aging treatment, or exercise replacement.

Regulatory and Research Status

Status questionAnswer as of August 21, 2026
FDA approved?No
Clinical-trial phaseNo human phase assigned
ClinicalTrials.govExact-name search returned zero studies
Established human dose?No
Dietary-supplement statusNot an established dietary ingredient
Main development directionChemical optimization including orally active SLU-PP-915

Sports / anti-doping: SLU-PP-332 is not clearly named in the searchable 2026 WADA list text, but S0 covers non-approved pharmacologic substances, and the compound is being studied for doping-detection potential. Absence of an exact-name listing is not permission.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is SLU-PP-332 a peptide?

No. It is a synthetic small organic molecule with the formula C18H14N2O2 — not an amino-acid chain.

What is the SLU-PP-332 dosage?

There is no established human dosage. Published studies used IP doses of 25–50 mg/kg in mice for specific experiments, which must not be presented as a human protocol.

Is oral SLU-PP-332 effective?

Published investigators reported that SLU-PP-332 lacks oral bioavailability. The oral mouse data belong to a different molecule, SLU-PP-915.

What is the half-life of SLU-PP-332?

The human half-life is unknown. The original paper measured mouse plasma and muscle concentrations at two and six hours after IP dosing — not enough to establish a robust half-life.

Does SLU-PP-332 increase endurance?

It increased treadmill endurance in a small mouse experiment. There is no human evidence that it improves VO2 max, race time, work capacity, or recovery.

Does SLU-PP-332 build muscle?

No anabolic or hypertrophy effect has been established. The main finding was a shift toward oxidative type IIa fibers and improved mouse endurance.

Does SLU-PP-332 burn fat or cause weight loss?

It increased fatty-acid oxidation and reduced fat accumulation in obese mice. No clinical trial has measured human weight loss or body composition.

Does SLU-PP-332 improve blood sugar?

The effect depended on the mouse model: glucose endpoints improved in metabolically impaired obese mice but not in healthy chow-fed mice. Human effects are unknown.

Is SLU-PP-332 FDA approved?

No. It is not FDA approved for weight loss, diabetes, heart failure, kidney disease, athletic performance, or any other indication.

Is SLU-PP-332 the same as cardarine?

No. SLU-PP-332 activates ERRs, whereas cardarine (GW501516) activates PPARδ. Chemistry, targets, development history, and risks differ.

Is SLU-PP-332 the same as SLU-PP-915?

No. SLU-PP-915 is a chemically distinct analog developed for oral activity. Data from one compound cannot be assigned to the other.

Can SLU-PP-332 replace exercise?

No. It reproduced selected molecular and metabolic signals in mice, not the full cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, neurologic, or psychological effects of exercise.

Is SLU-PP-332 prohibited in sport?

Athletes should treat it as prohibited or at minimum high-risk. WADA’s S0 category covers non-approved pharmacologic substances, and anti-doping researchers are developing analytical methods for SLU-PP-332.

References

Important Safety Information

SLU-PP-332 is an investigational small-molecule pan-ERR agonist. It is not a peptide, not FDA approved, and has no established human dosage or safety dataset.

It lacks oral bioavailability according to published investigators. Online products and animal IP doses must not be converted into human protocols.

This page is an evidence reference. It is not a dosing, reconstitution, stacking, or sports-performance guide.

Latest Research on SLU-PP-332

Stay updated on the latest peptide research

New studies and guides delivered to your inbox.